Comments on: If Boys Would Be Men, Would Girls Be Ladies? http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/ reb•e•lu•tion (reb’el lu shen) n. a teenage rebellion against low expectations Wed, 16 May 2012 16:54:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: free download microsoft office 2010 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-1284425 free download microsoft office 2010 Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:44:25 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-1284425 No, when the best quality quality is rotten such as pH, ammonia/nitrate levels, etc. the goldfish on turn stressed. The symptoms of accentuation are small migration, the gel circumjacent them see fit behove like irritated and virtuous, and they wishes hang out at the bottom of the tank in like a corner. Gulping at the materialize is not because of water quality. This is because the tank in not aerated tolerably or is too small. While those two can be to insistence and the foregoing symptoms, facetious adam's ale rank does not come in them gulp at the surface. Also I don't separate how much filtering a Brita membrane strain does. You yearn for some minerals in your water. Goldfish are especial catholic of qualifications with a view freshwater fish so adding aquarium dry humour would advise relieve stress. But again I don't fashion soda water importance is your problem. I fantasize it's aeration. I would offer making guaranteed there is breakage of interface tension, or add a bubbler. You can honest buy a supporter to away on the to all appearances of the excessively and that should be enough. No, when the best quality quality is rotten such as pH, ammonia/nitrate levels, etc. the goldfish on turn stressed. The symptoms of accentuation are small migration, the gel circumjacent them see fit behove like irritated and virtuous, and they wishes hang out at the bottom of the tank in like a corner. Gulping at the materialize is not because of water quality. This is because the tank in not aerated tolerably or is too small. While those two can be to insistence and the foregoing symptoms, facetious adam’s ale rank does not come in them gulp at the surface. Also I don’t separate how much filtering a Brita membrane strain does. You yearn for some minerals in your water. Goldfish are especial catholic of qualifications with a view freshwater fish so adding aquarium dry humour would advise relieve stress. But again I don’t fashion soda water importance is your problem. I fantasize it’s aeration. I would offer making guaranteed there is breakage of interface tension, or add a bubbler. You can honest buy a supporter to away on the to all appearances of the excessively and that should be enough.

]]> By: Natalie http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-561109 Natalie Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:31:47 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-561109 I'm really confused as to what exactly you are trying to say about feminism. I don't even know if I disagree with you on this, but I'm going to go ahead and play devil's advocate here. (just an expression! probably not a good one to use on a Christian blog, but there you are.) You said, "The heart of USA Today’s editorial was the failure of modern boys, not the success of modern girls. Its focus was, “Where are the boys?” And not, “Look at the girls!”" Doesn't it stand to reason that when numbers stay the same (as they will in a percentage) and the number of boys decreases, that the number of girls would increase? The blogger makes statements about the sad state of where most of the "boys" in the country are and how terrible a fate it is for them, even going so far as to suggest that mothers should be worried for their boys (and by extension, not their girls). So if the state of the boys is so bad, and the state of the girls is not even mentioned, then either the guy is being sexist by not mentioning women or he is implying that women have an advantage in the world. Perhaps the woman from NOW did not phrase her argument very well, and perhaps neither have I, but nevertheless the article could very well be seen as sexist. I’m really confused as to what exactly you are trying to say about feminism. I don’t even know if I disagree with you on this, but I’m going to go ahead and play devil’s advocate here. (just an expression! probably not a good one to use on a Christian blog, but there you are.) You said, “The heart of USA Today’s editorial was the failure of modern boys, not the success of modern girls. Its focus was, “Where are the boys?” And not, “Look at the girls!”” Doesn’t it stand to reason that when numbers stay the same (as they will in a percentage) and the number of boys decreases, that the number of girls would increase? The blogger makes statements about the sad state of where most of the “boys” in the country are and how terrible a fate it is for them, even going so far as to suggest that mothers should be worried for their boys (and by extension, not their girls). So if the state of the boys is so bad, and the state of the girls is not even mentioned, then either the guy is being sexist by not mentioning women or he is implying that women have an advantage in the world. Perhaps the woman from NOW did not phrase her argument very well, and perhaps neither have I, but nevertheless the article could very well be seen as sexist.

]]> By: mia http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2592 mia Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2592 True. Today's culture has been emasculated because of this idolatry of feminism. Feminists are so blindly fighting for their own rights they don't even see they're destroying them, and a few others to boot. True. Today’s culture has been emasculated because of this idolatry of feminism. Feminists are so blindly fighting for their own rights they don’t even see they’re destroying them, and a few others to boot.

]]> By: Nightfly http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2593 Nightfly Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2593 Huh. I just posted a whole bit on men unable to accept the mature responsibilities of adulthood - referring to you as a counter-example. And then I click over here and you guys already have the term "adultescence." I think I wasted about 200 words over at Dawn's blog. Seven times I bow before thee... Huh. I just posted a whole bit on men unable to accept the mature responsibilities of adulthood - referring to you as a counter-example. And then I click over here and you guys already have the term “adultescence.” I think I wasted about 200 words over at Dawn’s blog.

Seven times I bow before thee…

]]> By: Mr.G http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2594 Mr.G Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2594 Alex, Well done. Mr. G Alex,
Well done.
Mr. G

]]> By: Mrs. Reeves http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2595 Mrs. Reeves Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2595 Bravo! Bravo!

]]> By: Paul Ziegenfuss http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2596 Paul Ziegenfuss Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2596 Feminists (and liberals in general) have just about come to the end of their explanatory rope; if they were really being honest with themselves, they would realize (and admit) that (a)Feministic mothers emasculate their sons (it's true--you might as well cut off our skinnacles and damn us to the life of a eunich while you're at it), (b) More child-care funding makes all of us poorer, (c) No society can exist without men, neither healthily nor in practicality, and (d) The mainstream media propogates this pathetic drivel to the point of anality. Get used to it, Don. You have been taught to believe in and teach your children a lie. The Great Lie of our time. PMZ Feminists (and liberals in general) have just about come to the end of their explanatory rope; if they were really being honest with themselves, they would realize (and admit) that (a)Feministic mothers emasculate their sons (it’s true–you might as well cut off our skinnacles and damn us to the life of a eunich while you’re at it), (b) More child-care funding makes all of us poorer, (c) No society can exist without men, neither healthily nor in practicality, and (d) The mainstream media propogates this pathetic drivel to the point of anality.
Get used to it, Don. You have been taught to believe in and teach your children a lie. The Great Lie of our time.
PMZ

]]> By: Cristina http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2597 Cristina Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2597 I could not agree with you more,Alex and Brett.When one looks at what the modern defination of womenhood and manhood and the Biblical view,we can see how far people are from the original.I believe that when woman are true woman ,the men will take their place as leaders.As a woman I am called to be the mans helper,now that doesn`t mean that I can`t study or work,but I do believe that the family is the womens first responsibility.Not only that but also the womens first ministry.There is so much joy in Gods design for the family .But now women want to take the role of men and that is really distroying this generation. I could not agree with you more,Alex and Brett.When one looks at what the modern defination of womenhood and manhood and the Biblical view,we can see how far people are from the original.I believe that when woman are true woman ,the men will take their place as leaders.As a woman I am called to be the mans helper,now that doesn`t mean that I can`t study or work,but I do believe that the family is the womens first responsibility.Not only that but also the womens first ministry.There is so much joy in Gods design for the family .But now women want to take the role of men and that is really distroying this generation.

]]> By: Don http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2598 Don Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2598 I find it interesting that the "biblical" view is not one of balance but one of total dominance of one sex over the other. God forbid women should have equal standing in this world - hint - they still don't have it. Whenever women try to level the playing field, if men don't see themselves in a position of total dominance, they cry, whine & complain. I'm happy I raised daughters and sons who do not share these opinions. Only men can immasculate themselves and each man has a different view on what exactly it is to be masculine. I find it interesting that the “biblical” view is not one of balance but one of total dominance of one sex over the other. God forbid women should have equal standing in this world - hint - they still don’t have it. Whenever women try to level the playing field, if men don’t see themselves in a position of total dominance, they cry, whine & complain. I’m happy I raised daughters and sons who do not share these opinions. Only men can immasculate themselves and each man has a different view on what exactly it is to be masculine.

]]> By: Crystal Simone (17) http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/if-boys-would-be-men-would-girls-be-ladies/#comment-2599 Crystal Simone (17) Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/?p=74#comment-2599 Mr. Don, i absolutely disagree with you that the "Biblical view" is imbalanced. The Bible does say that a woman should submit to her HUSBAND, not all men. Furthermore, she is to submit to her husband only when he puts her (and his family's) best interest first. Plus, there are many many strong women in the Bible. Rahab is under celebrated, but she was very strong. I believe it's in Isaiah that her story is told. She harbored servants of the Lord in an unGodly city, a crime for which she could have been executed. It's one of my favorite stories. The femenists have gone from trying to gain rights to trampling on the rights of men. Look at any sitcom. Generally they feature a dumb, overweight, plain man married to an intelligent, thin, beautiful woman. It's a man-bashing industry at the moment. Also, i have a lesbian aunt who is a man-bashing femenist and it's very difficult to try to change these womens' minds. They are resolute in their prejudices against men. My aunt assumes all men are pigs, jerks, and pedophiles because of the fact that she was raped by one who happened to be all of the above. Her history doesn't justify her behavior though. Ms. Gandy (in the article) makes women look bad, as far as i'm concerned. I intend to be a science professor AND a mother. why? Because i want to! Is it a bad thing for women to be the nurterer? I'm all for women having careers and such, but in nature the female is the one who nurtures the children. Obviously the natural thing is for the woman to take care of the children. In general, men get their sense of worth from being the breadwinner and women get it from being a mother. that's simply how we're hardwired. there's nothing wrong with that. As far as i'm concerned many of the femenists have taken a step backward because they aren't engaging in a fight for their own rights anymore. Many of them have generalized, and now they're engaging in reverse discrimination. Mr. Don, i absolutely disagree with you that the “Biblical view” is imbalanced. The Bible does say that a woman should submit to her HUSBAND, not all men. Furthermore, she is to submit to her husband only when he puts her (and his family’s) best interest first. Plus, there are many many strong women in the Bible. Rahab is under celebrated, but she was very strong. I believe it’s in Isaiah that her story is told. She harbored servants of the Lord in an unGodly city, a crime for which she could have been executed. It’s one of my favorite stories.

The femenists have gone from trying to gain rights to trampling on the rights of men. Look at any sitcom. Generally they feature a dumb, overweight, plain man married to an intelligent, thin, beautiful woman. It’s a man-bashing industry at the moment.
Also, i have a lesbian aunt who is a man-bashing femenist and it’s very difficult to try to change these womens’ minds. They are resolute in their prejudices against men. My aunt assumes all men are pigs, jerks, and pedophiles because of the fact that she was raped by one who happened to be all of the above. Her history doesn’t justify her behavior though.
Ms. Gandy (in the article) makes women look bad, as far as i’m concerned. I intend to be a science professor AND a mother. why? Because i want to! Is it a bad thing for women to be the nurterer? I’m all for women having careers and such, but in nature the female is the one who nurtures the children. Obviously the natural thing is for the woman to take care of the children. In general, men get their sense of worth from being the breadwinner and women get it from being a mother. that’s simply how we’re hardwired. there’s nothing wrong with that.
As far as i’m concerned many of the femenists have taken a step backward because they aren’t engaging in a fight for their own rights anymore. Many of them have generalized, and now they’re engaging in reverse discrimination.

]]>