Comments on: The Civil Discussion Ruler Of The World! http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/ reb•e•lu•tion (reb’el lu shen) n. a teenage rebellion against the low expectations of an ungodly culture. Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:59:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 by: Alex King http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2628 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2628 Congratulations Jamie! Congratulations Jamie!

]]> by: Marshall Sherman http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2629 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2629 Nooooooooo....not at allllll. That connection wasn't even <i>made</i> in my mind. ;) Marshall Nooooooooo….not at allllll. That connection wasn’t even made in my mind. ;)

Marshall

]]> by: SecDef http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2630 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2630 Interesting....especially considering the discussion shwe ahve had about this..... Interesting….especially considering the discussion shwe ahve had about this…..

]]> by: J http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2631 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.therebelution.com/blog/2005/09/the-civil-discussion-ruler-of-the-world/#comment-2631 I am honored to have such a distinction bestowed on me. *bows* Oops...I mean... *curtsies* ;-) Anyway, Brett, I thought you gave a very good response. While I still retain my concerns about using Lev. 17 and 2 Peter 3 as proof that science confirms the Bible, the discussion has nevertheless been very thought-provoking and enriching. So, thanks for the stimulation! I am honored to have such a distinction bestowed on me. *bows*

Oops…I mean… *curtsies* ;-)

Anyway, Brett, I thought you gave a very good response. While I still retain my concerns about using Lev. 17 and 2 Peter 3 as proof that science confirms the Bible, the discussion has nevertheless been very thought-provoking and enriching. So, thanks for the stimulation!

]]>