“it is my sincerest belief that the government and my faith should remain seperate, for one is founded on reason and the other…faith.”

I would like to point out that this is a very flawed view of christianity, or any belief. First, christianity does not violate reason, although it may seem so when our corrupt human nature resents it. Also, one cannot truly seperate ones beliefs from any other aspect of life. This is because everything is molded by our worldview, spiritual glasses, presuppositions. I can’t think of anything else to add without some inpute from John, so that’s all.

Jonathan Safarti:What exactly makes you think that John is not a christian?

” Where students or other private graduation speakers are selected on the basis of genuinely neutral, evenhanded criteria and retain primary control over the content of their expression… that expression is not attributable to the school and, therefore, may not be restricted because of its religious (or anti-religious) content. To avoid any mistaken perception that a school endorses student or other private speech that is not in fact attributable to the school, school officials may make appropriate neutral disclaimers to clarify that such speech is not school sponsored.

So wouldn’t that mean that she wasn’t violating the first and fourteenth amendment?
Seeing as the District Regulations state that the “expression is not attributable to the school and, therefore, may not be restricted because of its religious (or anti-religious) content.”

Am I totally off base or is my assumption correct?

– — –
MGB ICL
Joshua